This paper provides a systematic review of studies on the energy and climate impacts of teleworking. Findings show that while teleworking often reduces energy consumption through decreased commuting, other factors, like increased home energy use and non-work travel, can offset these savings. Although 26 of the 39 studies reviewed suggest net energy reductions, the overall impact remains context-dependent. The review highlights the complexities of teleworking’s environmental impacts, underlining the need for comprehensive policies that maximize net energy savings.
Context and quantification
Timeline
1995–2019
About the policy
Area
Energy, Climate Action
Instrument
Flexible work policies
Intervention
Teleworking initiatives
Cost
None
Funding
None
Institutional arrangement
None
Impacts
Stakeholders involved
Employees, employers
Stakeholders impacted
Remote workers
Wellbeing
Life Satisfaction
Justice consideration
Procedural
Metadata
Lead author name | Andrew Hook |
---|---|
Lead author gender | Male |
Lead author institution | University of Sussex |
Lead author institution location | Sussex, UK |
Peer reviewed? | true |
Grey literature? | false |
Type of paper | Review |
Volume | 15 |
Publication year | 2020 |
URL / DOI | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8a84 |
Sufficiency mentioned? | false |